
APPROACH: Nurture Your Strategy, Don’t Launch It
Developing and deploying a new corporate strategy is not something to be taken lightly. Not a single executive believes their strategy is a meaningless decree that should be shared haphazardly across an organization; hoping people just buy into it.
The key is communication and buy-in. When this is done well, it can align your organization and generate seriously beneficial outcomes. Executives spend months reading market research, listening to customer requirements, grappling with changing marketplace conditions and then forming a strategy that they believe will help the organization achieved strategic objectives. Yet, they spend very little time on how they will roll the strategy out to their people beyond the initial memo, PowerPoint or town-hall meeting. Seems counter-intuitive, right?
Think about teaching a child to ride a bike. You wouldn’t just hand over a bike, tell her to have fun and leave her to figure it out. You would teach her balance, control and skill and probably start her off with a set of training wheels first. The same mindset should be applied to deploying a strategy. Don’t just roll out a giant presentation deck and tell your people it’s time to execute. You need to take it in steps.
The high performers we looked at nurtured their strategies instead of just assuming people would know what to do. They made sure everyone understood their respective roles, what the strategy meant for them as individuals, and how their work would impact the company as a whole. It was an ongoing conversation sustained over a lengthy period of time. These high performers made it safe for their people to experience some failure along the way, helping them understand what they could learn from failure and then demonstrating what success would look like and celebrating little wins along the way.
Seeing It In Action
A large U.S. contact center decided to evolve its strategy over a three-year period. The company holds an annual conference where everyone could see where they were on strategy execution, what they could improve, when they experienced failure and what they could learn with the goal of constantly iterating and improving the strategy over time and incorporating learnings along the way.
- Conference year 1: They laid out the playing field and explained the strategy.
- Conference year 2: They talked about growth, stabilization and what they could learn.
- Conference year 3: They discussed how they could lead and continue to grow to outpace their industry and set the bar.
The concept of curiosity helps catapult strategy execution. It allows us to be conscious about the areas where capability needs to be nurtured until we secure some early wins. These then build the confidence that becomes the common way we perform. And by taking this approach, they are seeing a strategy that is fruitful, yet flexible enough to evolve over time and adjust to changing market conditions.

APPROACH: Hardwire the Last 100 Yards
Strategy is like an energy company. The strategy creators are akin to the power plant that generates the energy. The leaders who need to convey the strategy within the organization are responsible for taking that generated energy and distributing it, like power lines. The final step in the process is hardwiring the last 100 yards, from the utility pole, to the house, through the outlet, to the actual light bulb.
Oftentimes, we make it through the whole process but stop short of the hardwiring. The result is disconnects between the new strategy and daily routine; the lights aren’t on yet and the people don’t know how to flip the switch. Without a clear purpose and how their role helps deliver or support the outcome, your employees can’t effectively drive your strategy. You need to connect the dots between the strategy and the actual job.
Seeing It In Action
In many hotels, most of the people on the “frontlines” don’t know much about the strategy, let alone care about the actual performance metrics. At one leading hotel chain, they spend an intensive amount of time helping everyone – no matter their role, understand the strategy, recognize how their actions and behaviors impact the strategy and what that means to the measures the organization is using to identify success.
This translates to high levels for performance and engagement to the point that a front desk employee looks at customer satisfaction scores on a daily basis, rating herself and striving to see where she could improve. She makes it her business to work toward raising scores because she knew customer satisfaction is a huge differentiator in her company’s market.
She connected her role to a very specific metric that could move the needle for the entire organization. Actions like this create a profound sense of engagement and understanding of what the organization is trying to achieve right at the front line level.
And at this organization, they are starting to see significant results on the customer experience, customer satisfaction and growth.

APPROACH: Clear Up the Paradox of Accountability
Some people draw very definitive lines regarding accountability. Mine = my business and my urge to drive success. Yours = not my problem. At the other end of the spectrum, there are people and organizations that are collaborative to a fault. They lack any decision-making mechanism – doing everything “by committee” or consensus, which significantly hinders results, largely because they are not measuring success against a clear objective or outcome – they’re just focused on getting on the same page or reaching the same conclusion.
Collaboration and accountability need to be tied to a common goal or purpose. One other distinction between collaboration and consensus is that in collaboration, not everyone has an equal voice, but that everyone has a voice and that voice is valued and enables the group to work towards their end goal. Accountability plays a role by helping the participants that are collaborating to understand what part they play in achieving the outcomes and working their roles and responsibilities to support that outcome.
Few companies have truly figured out the right balance of collaboration and accountability, which means they either get nothing done or people will do the things they are being held accountable for or incented on, but don’t step back to look at how that impacts the big picture or how they could be better supporting other initiatives across the business.
Navigating this collaboration paradox is difficult and takes time and patience, just like nurturing the strategy itself. It involves learning from mistakes, openness and feedback loops to strike the right balance and answer the important questions. In achieving co-accountability, you create shared metrics so everyone has a horse in the race.
Seeing It In Action
A group at a large produce wholesaler encountered this very paradox between accountability and collaboration. Two teams – one in sales and one in buying – who needed to work together were finding it difficult to achieve the outcomes they were responsible for driving. For the organization to be successful, this group needed to find that balance, but they were constantly at odds with one another and ended up working towards different goals and would sway too far towards accountability or too far towards collaboration, but couldn’t find the balance.
It took two years for the group – led by the managers of each of the group – to uncover the best way to collaborate and hold themselves accountable. It required changing the team dynamics, identifying the right metrics to measure against and the incentive that drove the right behaviors.